Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language
by sideeffffect on Sunday November 27, 2022 @03:21AM
(#33761374)
Are there any officially supported Google products under github.com/google ?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Are there any officially supported Google products?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language
by bheadmaster on Sunday November 27, 2022 @04:20AM
(#33761619)
Are there any Google products?
Are there any Google?
Are there any?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language
by rad_gruchalski on Sunday November 27, 2022 @04:46AM
(#33761714)
Are there?
Are?
?
.
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language
by halffullbrain on Sunday November 27, 2022 @06:09AM
(#33762125)
ʔ
Does existence exist?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language
by alex_smart on Sunday November 27, 2022 @05:03AM
(#33761794)
Are we Reddit yet?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language
by threatofrain on Sunday November 27, 2022 @03:22AM
(#33761381)
Even if there aren't, it makes sense to clarify to media that this is an open source project made without any business commitments. I've seen other businesses do something similar; internally it reduces friction with the business admin when devs want to open source something.
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language
by throwawaybutwhy on Sunday November 27, 2022 @03:34AM
(#33761446)
_without any business commitments_ - not to sound trite, but when is the last time Google stood by its commitments?
Google still sells ads, doesn't it?
Didn't they originally claim to never show ads in search given that it is in direct opposition to search results quality? Back in the days when Pagerank was hot.
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language
by AlotOfReading on Sunday November 27, 2022 @02:19PM
(#33765746)
That was in the original pagerank publications. Google had lots of other early attempts to make money that avoided advertising (like the search appliance [0]), but the firehose of money from ads dwarfed anything else they could ever find and that early Google didn't last long.
Was that a "business commitment" or a "user commitment"?
Would Google Guice count?