News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by sideeffffect on Sunday November 27, 2022 @03:21AM (#33761374)
Are there any officially supported Google products under github.com/google ?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by xendo on Sunday November 27, 2022 @03:31AM (#33761430)
Are there any officially supported Google products?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by bheadmaster on Sunday November 27, 2022 @04:20AM (#33761619)
Are there any Google products?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by pieshop on Sunday November 27, 2022 @04:34AM (#33761669)
Are there any Google?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by memorable on Sunday November 27, 2022 @04:41AM (#33761696)
Are there any?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by rad_gruchalski on Sunday November 27, 2022 @04:46AM (#33761714)
Are there?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by pieshop on Sunday November 27, 2022 @04:48AM (#33761724)
Are?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by 867-5309 on Sunday November 27, 2022 @04:52AM (#33761744)
?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by TylerE on Sunday November 27, 2022 @05:55AM (#33762061)
.
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by halffullbrain on Sunday November 27, 2022 @06:09AM (#33762125)
ʔ
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by aatd86 on Sunday November 27, 2022 @04:46AM (#33761719)
Does existence exist?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by alex_smart on Sunday November 27, 2022 @05:03AM (#33761794)
Are we Reddit yet?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by threatofrain on Sunday November 27, 2022 @03:22AM (#33761381)
Even if there aren't, it makes sense to clarify to media that this is an open source project made without any business commitments. I've seen other businesses do something similar; internally it reduces friction with the business admin when devs want to open source something.
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by throwawaybutwhy on Sunday November 27, 2022 @03:34AM (#33761446)
_without any business commitments_ - not to sound trite, but when is the last time Google stood by its commitments?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by ithkuil on Sunday November 27, 2022 @04:47AM (#33761721)
Google still sells ads, doesn't it?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by namkt on Sunday November 27, 2022 @06:11AM (#33762139)
Didn't they originally claim to never show ads in search given that it is in direct opposition to search results quality? Back in the days when Pagerank was hot.
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by AlotOfReading on Sunday November 27, 2022 @02:19PM (#33765746)
That was in the original pagerank publications. Google had lots of other early attempts to make money that avoided advertising (like the search appliance [0]), but the firehose of money from ads dwarfed anything else they could ever find and that early Google didn't last long.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Search_Appliance

Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by ithkuil on Sunday November 27, 2022 @02:19PM (#33765747)
Was that a "business commitment" or a "user commitment"?
Re:ᚣ the Rune Programming Language by ayewo on Sunday November 27, 2022 @03:33AM (#33761444)
Would Google Guice count?

https://github.com/google/guice