News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Twitter didn’t go down: From a real Twitter SRE by adalacelove on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @10:13AM (#33706644)
> Like if we're not there entering the "numbers" 4 6 15 16 24 32 every 108 minutes, the entire business is going to crumbl

Never I have encountered an engineer that thought that.

Re:Why Twitter didn’t go down: From a real Twitter SRE by nobleach on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @10:50AM (#33707029)
One need look no further than the O'reilly book on Microservices. First chapter I believe. We call ourselves "engineers" but the truth is, real engineers have real consequences when their designs fail. (buildings fall, bridges fall, etc). It's not a unique take. Now I'm not going to argue about engineering vs developing vs programming as that opens a massive can of worms.
Re:Why Twitter didn’t go down: From a real Twitter SRE by tester756 on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @11:22AM (#33707455)
What a weird criteria to define engineering - consequences!
Re:Why Twitter didn’t go down: From a real Twitter SRE by nobleach on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @11:46AM (#33707766)
It's not my designation to give. An "engineer" actually needs rigorous certifications, backed by a certain education.
Re:Why Twitter didn’t go down: From a real Twitter SRE by tester756 on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @02:44PM (#33710346)
If I do have an engineering degree in informatics, then when developing code I'm doing engineering - right?

"rigorous certifications" - just a degree... not so rigorous

Re:Why Twitter didn’t go down: From a real Twitter SRE by chasd00 on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @11:47AM (#33707784)
>> Like if we're not there entering the "numbers" 4 6 15 16 24 32 every 108 minutes, the entire business is going to crumbl

> Never I have encountered an engineer that thought that.

there are people all up and down this page saying effectively just that. well i guess i'm assuming most of these people are engineers in the software sense of the word.