Re:Latam Airlines Airbus A320neo hits fire engine on runway ...
by kumarvvr on Saturday November 19, 2022 @11:30AM
(#33671590)
God, That page blasted every product I searched for in past week onto my face.
Re:Latam Airlines Airbus A320neo hits fire engine on runway ...
by rdtsc on Saturday November 19, 2022 @11:54AM
(#33671839)
Using the Brave browser and I didn't see a single add. Looked like a simple forum page from the early 2000s to me. I see that Brave blocked about 8 adds so that's probably what you saw.
Re:Latam Airlines Airbus A320neo hits fire engine on runway ...
by CydeWeys on Saturday November 19, 2022 @12:23PM
(#33672231)
I'm using Android Chrome on a network with a PiHole and didn't see any ads either.
Re:Latam Airlines Airbus A320neo hits fire engine on runway ...
by bmer on Saturday November 19, 2022 @12:42PM
(#33672487)
Using Firefox with uBlock Origin, and saw nothing.
Re:Latam Airlines Airbus A320neo hits fire engine on runway ...
by irrational on Saturday November 19, 2022 @02:24PM
(#33673659)
Why are you using the internet without ublock origin installed?
Re:Latam Airlines Airbus A320neo hits fire engine on runway ...
by Sakos on Saturday November 19, 2022 @02:36PM
(#33673764)
I just disabled my adblocker and checked it out. It's actually okay ad-wise, imo. I see far worse on a lot of other sites.
Re:Latam Airlines Airbus A320neo hits fire engine on runway ...
by dang on Saturday November 19, 2022 @04:02PM
(#33674636)
That of course is extremely annoying, but:
"Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—things like article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting."
More detail
> An ATC report states in writing that the rescue vehicle entered runway 16 from the west at the height of taxiway B without authorization and collided with flight LA-2213.