Eg for fake meat: if we don't know if saturated fats are good or not due to contradictive studies then what do we know of thousands of other substances in real vs fake meat which have not recieved not even 1% of the study/resources/research resoruces than "saturated fat good vs bad"?
How you can find that to be strawman or "wrong" is beyond me.
But then again, I've come to the sad conclusion that most researches in the field of nutrition and academia are complete morons incapable of grasping complexity.
That's one of your straw men, that the elite are working towards banning meat. In reality, 99/100 of the elite enjoy steak. They may pretend otherwise when giving speeches to certain crowds, but look at what they do, not what they say.
My point was tied to NUTRITION not to what politicians do vs say.
You don't even know how to use "strawman" correctly.
And this still keeps on happening...
Check these videos https://www.youtube.com/@NutritionMadeSimple/search?query=sa...
If you find a study that you think is worth investigating contact the author, he reviews medical studies for a living and as a passion.
I think what most of us agree on, whether we're rich or poor is that there are massive environmental problems which are only get worse the more people there are - and in the last couple of generations there's been a population explosion. Now the question is how do we decide what to do about it. The problem with groups like the WEF is that they're elitist and fundamentally undemocratic, not that they're looking for alternatives to conventional meat. These people want to decide for us and rule over us. There is no plan to give regular people agency in deciding our future, it's rich folks, corporations and state leaders (many of whom are unelected or sham elected) planning global governance and the future of our world.
They have these reductionist beliefs that you can grow meat in vats and somehow have it be equally nutritious than real meat despite the fact that we don't even know basic things such as "are saturated fats bad or not" since each study contradicts the previous one.
Or setting delusional deadlines for electric cars without realizing it may not be possible and will just end up making cars 3x more expensive to own.
Or connecting to force untested vaccinations to everyone in tandem and when the results start coming in that the vaccines are not as safe as initialy thought they will just ping their media to "forget and move on" to the "next current thing".
So even if these clowns think that they're doing good they're gonna blow everything up due to their ignorance and naivety.