News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes is sentenced to more than 11 years for f... by Retric on Friday November 18, 2022 @06:56PM (#33664768)
I disagree simply because many people go on to commit the same crime again after release. Most notably with a few serial killers who continued after release.

That isn’t to say we should lock everyone who commits a serious crime up for life, just that there can be utility for seemingly excessively long sentences.

It’s really the ~5-10 year convictions that are over used IMO. I think we have lost sight of how large a penalty 3 years actually is.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes is sentenced to more than 11 years for f... by highwaylights on Friday November 18, 2022 @07:42PM (#33665260)
I think parents point was that if you’re old enough a 40 year sentence might as well be a 1,000 year sentence, because you’re never getting out either way.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes is sentenced to more than 11 years for f... by aswanson on Friday November 18, 2022 @07:24PM (#33665062)
Serial killers should be locked up for life. Full-stop.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes is sentenced to more than 11 years for f... by actionfromafar on Friday November 18, 2022 @08:33PM (#33665714)
Yeah but sometimes you don’t know they are serial killers until they go out and do it the second time.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes is sentenced to more than 11 years for f... by Retric on Friday November 18, 2022 @08:58PM (#33665914)
And sometimes they let them go, this list has a surprising number of people who got long though limited sentences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_serial_killers_by_numb...

Re:Elizabeth Holmes is sentenced to more than 11 years for f... by mrep on Friday November 18, 2022 @07:49PM (#33665323)
IDK, fraud gamble for the chance to become a billionaire sounds way more attractive if the worse case is 3 years in prison. 3 years is less than college whereas 11 is basically k-12.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes is sentenced to more than 11 years for f... by Retric on Friday November 18, 2022 @08:32PM (#33665700)
Fraud on that scale definitely deserves a stronger penalty.

I was more talking about cases like this where prosecutors sought 10 years for a protester getting excessively confrontational with police officers and now she is serving 4 years in prison: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/pregnant-black-activist-...

The jury acquitted Martin of inciting a riot and reached no verdict on whether she threatened officers’ lives. Her legal team was “elated” when jurors found her guilty only of breaching the peace, punishable by no more than a $500 fine and 30 days in jail, investigator Tony Kennedy recalled.

State law defines breachers of the peace as any disturbers, “dangerous and disorderly persons” or people who utter “menaces or threatening speeches.” But prosecutors presented the charge as a “high and aggravated” crime, which carries up to 10 years imprisonment. Rosado said Judge Kirk Griffin did not allow her to explain the distinction, and the possibility of a much stiffer penalty, to the jury.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes is sentenced to more than 11 years for f... by Aeolun on Saturday November 19, 2022 @05:24AM (#33668890)
> there can be utility for seemingly excessively long sentences

That’s only if there is no rehabilitation. The US system seems to be focused solely/overtly on punishment, which obviously means that whoever got locked up hasn’t had their mental state improved during the time of their lockup.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes is sentenced to more than 11 years for f... by aerostable_slug on Saturday November 19, 2022 @02:53PM (#33673945)
There is some rehabilitation, but obviously not what we'd like to see. I work with formerly incarcerated individuals that have ended up going on to do quite well.

There's also a phenomenon where gang bangers and the like "age out" — they just seem to stop. Unfortunately for many, this realization often occurs in the middle of a very lengthy sentence (they typically drop out, debrief, and enter protective custody).

Sadly, for many rehab isn't just a matter of wanting to do better. Very large numbers of the incarcerated can't do something as seemingly trivial as parse a bus schedule. Aside from undereducation, a fair amount are objectively unintelligent. When all you know is crime and you have a massive uphill battle just to be what many would consider a functional adult, recidivism seems inevitable for some. What makes it worse is that cultural reasons prevent many from reaching out for help while they're behind the wire. It's frankly sad to see, but we're getting better —the investments being made in tablets and the like will hopefully bear fruit in the coming years.