Some notes on the Stable Diffusion safety filter

Re:Some notes on the Stable Diffusion safety filter by Animats on Friday November 18, 2022 @12:28PM (#33658194)

That problem is being solved. Pornhub now has an AI R&D unit.[1] Their current project is to upscale and colorize out of copyright vintage porn. As a training set, they use modern porn. They point out that they have access to a big training set.

Next step, porn generation.

[1] https://www.pornhub.com/art/remastured

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Some notes on the Stable Diffusion safety filter by sillysaurusx on Friday November 18, 2022 @01:17PM (#33659186)

For a glimpse at what’s possible:

https://www.reddit.com/r/unstablediffusion

https://www.reddit.com/r/aiwaifu

I’ve been trying to generate tentacle porn since 2019 or so. It’s the whole reason I got into AI. We’re finally there, and it only took three years.

Can’t wait to see what 2026 brings. http://n.actionsack.com/pic/media%2FFh08F_hXkAAhalt.jpg

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Some notes on the Stable Diffusion safety filter by GuB-42 on Friday November 18, 2022 @02:49PM (#33661013)

> https://www.reddit.com/r/unstablediffusion

This subreddit was banned due to a violation of Reddit's rules against non-consensual intimate media.

Interesting. Why "non-consensual"? Does it mean Stable Diffusion generated porn of people who actually exist?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Some notes on the Stable Diffusion safety filter by emmelaich on Friday November 18, 2022 @03:41PM (#33661803)

unstable_diffusion is still around. Note the underscore.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Some notes on the Stable Diffusion safety filter by sbierwagen on Friday November 18, 2022 @03:00PM (#33661177)

Yes, reddit routinely bans deepfake subreddits. In practice, this means any net that can produce output that looks like any living person is banned.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Some notes on the Stable Diffusion safety filter by sillysaurusx on Friday November 18, 2022 @03:53PM (#33661998)

Sorry all, I was typing it on my phone and missed an underscore. Here’s the proper link:

https://www.reddit.com/r/unstable_diffusion

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Some notes on the Stable Diffusion safety filter by pessimizer on Friday November 18, 2022 @04:25PM (#33662471)

> Their current project is to upscale and colorize out of copyright vintage porn.

But not very well. I collect this stuff and I have my own copies, so I can tell you that this doesn't look better than the b/w originals in quality/detail, and it's easy to see that the color is not great, especially if there are lots of hard lights and shadows dancing around.

That being said, I don't know why it's not working. Seems like it should work. I'd expect it to at least be clean of scratches and stabilized. Any relevant papers I should read about AI restoration of old film?

[ Parent | on HN ]