Re:Three N.H. towns are testing new voting machines that use...
by Kinrany on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @10:43AM
(#33533199)
The current system does make this expensive. Making the ballots public will effectively make the votes public once some student posts a model on github.
Re:Three N.H. towns are testing new voting machines that use...
by somenameforme on Friday November 11, 2022 @12:16AM
(#33557542)
To be clear, you do mean makes the voters public right? Because the whole idea of this suggestion is precisely to make the votes public. And I do agree that, within hours, there would be models developed to effectively parse the ballots and help detect any discrepancy - something the current centralized operators just can't seem to manage.
The problem is if the people casting the ballots can be identified by third parties. And in this regard, I don't understand what you mean or if that is what you are even talking about.
The other practical issue with this concern is that buying or coercion would need to be of substantial scale, centralized, advertised, involved traceable transactions, and so on. And this is a criminal felony so the consequences for a leak are substantial. Ultimately, it just does not seem like a realistic attack vector.
So in many ways, I would consider this a feature more than a bug. You can personally verify that your ballot did indeed get counted (at least if you're willing to dig through thousands of ballots looking for your 'secret code') without allowing anybody else to see how you voted.