News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The First Female Crash Dummy Has Arrived. Parent comment

Re:The First Female Crash Dummy Has Arrived by yellowapple on Monday November 07, 2022 @05:59PM (#33513750)
> Dude. I never said that they were indistuinguishable.

Then why would you police my language and demand I use the exact same terminology for a very wide range of body sizes/masses?

> There's levels from fat to hambeast to "their movement influences tides".

And there's likewise levels from thin to fit to bulky to curvy to plump to fat.

> That doesn't make the first category acceptable.

And who, pray tell, are you to decide what is or is not "acceptable"?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The First Female Crash Dummy Has Arrived by AllegedAlec on Tuesday November 08, 2022 @06:52AM (#33518165)
> Then why would you police my language and demand I use the exact same terminology for a very wide range of body sizes/masses?

I never said anything about the language you should use. I said "that is really fat though". This is all pure projection on your end.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The First Female Crash Dummy Has Arrived by yellowapple on Tuesday November 08, 2022 @12:43PM (#33521831)
You literally did:

> it's frankly an indictment of the US that people try to sweettalk this sort of behaviour with words like 'curvier' and 'plumper'

Your words, not mine.

[ Parent | on HN ]