News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Barilla Passive Cooker by piva00 on Sunday November 06, 2022 @07:44PM (#33499549)
Drip coffee is pretty good, good taste and caffeine content while being pretty simple to brew, a decent machine is cheap as well. It's just a method, the beans you use are what actually count.
Re:Barilla Passive Cooker by bradleyjg on Sunday November 06, 2022 @07:54PM (#33499624)
The worst part of a standard American drip coffee machine is cleaning it. Too many different nooks and crannies to get gross.

I find pour over to be one of the easiest methods in amortized time. It takes three minutes to make a cup but the clean up time is only another 30 seconds—-throw away the paper filter and rinse the dripper.

Re:Barilla Passive Cooker by piva00 on Sunday November 06, 2022 @07:58PM (#33499668)
Those suck, I use a Moccamaster that's been beating around for at least some 30 years. Bought it second hand and never had an issue in the past 15 years, reliable, easy to clean. It's a delight of design based in functionality for me.
Re:Barilla Passive Cooker by nuclearnice3 on Sunday November 06, 2022 @08:15PM (#33499796)
Recommend any particular beans?
Re:Barilla Passive Cooker by bradleyjg on Sunday November 06, 2022 @08:32PM (#33499913)
The time since roast matters a lot. Find a local roaster, you can get fresh roasted and it’s unlikely someone that went through the effort of setting up a local roaster is going to buy crap beans. Also, I’d recommend light roast.
Re:Barilla Passive Cooker by philwelch on Sunday November 06, 2022 @08:48PM (#33500031)
And pour-over is just you manually doing what the drip coffee machine does for you.
Re:Barilla Passive Cooker by vel0city on Sunday November 06, 2022 @09:04PM (#33500162)
I don't drink the bean juice personally, so I've got no skin in the game. To me it definitely seems like a drip coffee maker could make a cup of Joe just about as good as most other methods. I do think it's a combination of the burner burning the coffee after and also a coolness factor (that's how my parents did it, gross!) that drives a lot of the hipness of alternative brewing methods in the US.

But as mentioned I don't really have a horse in this race to begin with. Drink what makes you happy however you brew it. :)

Re:Barilla Passive Cooker by nephanth on Monday November 07, 2022 @12:39AM (#33501623)
I'm not going to judge which one is better (though I personally prefer espresso, it's a matter of preference), but coffee brewed with different methods definitely tastes differently. Coffee brewed at higher pressure (3~4 bar for moka pot, >9bar for espresso) tend to taste way stronger and more flavorful (which is why they're drank in lower quantities)
Re:Barilla Passive Cooker by vineyardmike on Sunday November 06, 2022 @10:22PM (#33500722)
Hard Disagree.

Espresso and similar pressure based brewing (Moka Pot) is far superior with equal beans. Tastes way better, more flexibility in creating different drinks, very fast to brew, etc . If it’s too concentrated or hard to drink an espresso shot then you dilute it (for all you black-coffee drinkers, it’s ok to use milk, it’s still coffee).

Re:Barilla Passive Cooker by piva00 on Monday November 07, 2022 @07:20AM (#33504867)
Different methods of brewing give you different results. If you like (or just want) a stronger flavour, use a pressurised method (espresso, moka pot, etc.), more flavour but the caffeine content is going to be lower than a longer brewing method.

I drink coffee in different ways in different days. If I want a large amount in the morning I go for a drip coffee or french press, the taste is smoother and caffeine content higher. If I want to taste the fullness of the beans I use a moka at home.

I don't see other methods of brewing as objectively better or worse, it depends on the result you expect or want, some days I want an espresso in the morning, some days I want a lot more caffeine, etc.

Also, I just drink coffee, I don't make drinks or turned coffee into a hobby.