Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission...
by dr_dshiv on Sunday November 06, 2022 @09:39AM
(#33493075)
The moon is more interesting than either. Focus on asteroid belts. Big gravity wells suck.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission...
by newZWhoDis on Sunday November 06, 2022 @10:10AM
(#33493409)
It’s not sexy but it’s true. Asteroid mining will completely change life on earth.
Imagine the technical implications of copper, gold, platinum, etc becoming as cheap and abundant as tin foil.
Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission...
by Moissanite on Sunday November 06, 2022 @10:40AM
(#33493732)
I imagine the most efficient option will be to either crash the asteroids into the Earth directly (assuming they aren't too big), or "land" them on the moon for exploitation there. Sending a whole mining/refining rig to each asteroid feels a bit too high risk.
Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission...
by dr_dshiv on Sunday November 06, 2022 @01:43PM
(#33495727)
Disagree. You can just electromagnetic mass drive the finished good back to earth orbit for collection.
Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission...
by pencilguin on Sunday November 06, 2022 @01:57PM
(#33495837)
Right. The bottom of a gravity well is a nuisance for anything other than human survival.
Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission...
by Moissanite on Sunday November 06, 2022 @06:21PM
(#33498712)
You can't "just" do anything. Landing a significant payload on an asteroid is barely do-able right now. We are a long way from building mining rigs and railguns up there; clamping on an engine and some extra propellant is much more viable in the near term - generously estimated at within the next 30 years.
Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission...
by Nomentatus on Sunday November 06, 2022 @11:54PM
(#33501330)
You're right, efficiency won't come first - but you're replying to a comment about efficient means. I'm 65plus, 30 yrs doesn't seem so very long to me.
Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission...
by dr_dshiv on Monday November 07, 2022 @03:03AM
(#33502651)
The point is that if each return journey requires propellant, you need to restock. An EM rail gun can just use solar power for continuous return. Rail guns are a present day technology.
You will already need substantial solar power and batteries, that’s not in question.
Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission...
by Moissanite on Monday November 07, 2022 @07:19AM
(#33504866)
No-one is talking about multiple round trips to the asteroid. Moving the whole asteroid at once to a more mine-able location (the bottom of a gravity well, where people can actually use the material) is what I expect to be easier near term. Mass-driving from the asteroid to a target location is interesting too, but seems even more sci-fi. Frankly I don't expect to see either happen in my lifetime.
Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission...
by Nomentatus on Sunday November 06, 2022 @11:52PM
(#33501320)
Or even physical catapult.