Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission...
by Moissanite on Sunday November 06, 2022 @06:21PM
(#33498712)
You can't "just" do anything. Landing a significant payload on an asteroid is barely do-able right now. We are a long way from building mining rigs and railguns up there; clamping on an engine and some extra propellant is much more viable in the near term - generously estimated at within the next 30 years.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission...
by Nomentatus on Sunday November 06, 2022 @11:54PM
(#33501330)
You're right, efficiency won't come first - but you're replying to a comment about efficient means. I'm 65plus, 30 yrs doesn't seem so very long to me.
Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission...
by dr_dshiv on Monday November 07, 2022 @03:03AM
(#33502651)
The point is that if each return journey requires propellant, you need to restock. An EM rail gun can just use solar power for continuous return. Rail guns are a present day technology.
You will already need substantial solar power and batteries, that’s not in question.
Re:NASA Puts Jet Propulsion Lab on Blast over Psyche Mission...
by Moissanite on Monday November 07, 2022 @07:19AM
(#33504866)
No-one is talking about multiple round trips to the asteroid. Moving the whole asteroid at once to a more mine-able location (the bottom of a gravity well, where people can actually use the material) is what I expect to be easier near term. Mass-driving from the asteroid to a target location is interesting too, but seems even more sci-fi. Frankly I don't expect to see either happen in my lifetime.