Boeing Needs an Act of Congress or Something Worse to Get Max 7 and 10 Flying

Re:Boeing Needs an Act of Congress or Something Worse to Get... by ncallaway on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @04:01PM (#33426674)

> Honestly, if you aren't part of the aviation industry in some professional capacity, I don't think you're entitled to an opinion on this.

Unless the proposal is to only use the aircraft for flying cargo, this is absolute nonsense.

As soon as the public is allowed to board the aircraft for regular flights, then *OF COURSE* the public is entitled to an opinion about how safe aircraft should be. To even suggest otherwise is, frankly, nonsense.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Boeing Needs an Act of Congress or Something Worse to Get... by pvarangot on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @04:08PM (#33426773)

Maybe cargo but over seas? I mean if an airplane crashes it crashes on someone else's land, unless Boing is buying land to build like a flying railroad or something then everyone that lives close enough to an air route has a say on what they fly above them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Boeing Needs an Act of Congress or Something Worse to Get... by gambiting on Tuesday November 01, 2022 @04:15PM (#33426858)

Last time I checked, there's remarkably few airports in international waters. Most big airports that are cargo hubs are(unsurprisingly) next to major cities.

[ Parent | on HN ]