News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Did the F-14 Tomcat Retire Decades Before Its Peers? ... by Mikeb85 on Sunday October 30, 2022 @01:09PM (#33396328)
> F-14s break a lot more

Pretty sure this is the answer lol...

Re:Why Did the F-14 Tomcat Retire Decades Before Its Peers? ... by CH1jZci6jV on Sunday October 30, 2022 @01:28PM (#33396522)
F-18s def are lower maintenance overall but they couldn’t go very far (important when your ship isn’t docked in Bagdad) or drop bombs in adverse weather so not very useful during a war. Doesn’t mean they are not politically useful, though. One part is made in each congressional district on purpose.
Re:Why Did the F-14 Tomcat Retire Decades Before Its Peers? ... by sedatk on Sunday October 30, 2022 @01:34PM (#33396590)
Is that the case with Super Hornets too?
Re:Why Did the F-14 Tomcat Retire Decades Before Its Peers? ... by stouset on Sunday October 30, 2022 @01:41PM (#33396678)
Super hornets have about 100mi shorter combat range than the Tomcat. That said they are capable of buddy air-air refueling so that can extend their range by a bit (at the cost of an extra pilot, airframe, and associated costs which doesn’t get to carry a useful payload).
Re:Why Did the F-14 Tomcat Retire Decades Before Its Peers? ... by izacus on Sunday October 30, 2022 @01:37PM (#33396630)
Yes, the 18s and 16s have relatively low fuel capacity in comparison to the 14. The F-35 finally improved on tank capacity quite a bit.