News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Tour of C++, 3rd edition (covering C++20 plus a few lik... by pjmlp on Sunday October 30, 2022 @09:01AM (#33394113)
I am not the only one, this is a common discussion point on C++ communities.

Clang first should spend it's resources catching up with C++20, instead of spending them on C++23. The standard is yet to be fully finished.

Re:A Tour of C++, 3rd edition (covering C++20 plus a few lik... by throwaway311022 on Sunday October 30, 2022 @10:19PM (#33401341)
Who exactly cares about C++20? Most (mis)features of the “standard” won’t be used for years anyway, until the codegen stabilizes and performance impact will be known. Most of people in these communities never got a dollar for a line of C++, and people who did rarely express their opinion (but you can still find it online if you try)
Re:A Tour of C++, 3rd edition (covering C++20 plus a few lik... by snovv_crash on Monday October 31, 2022 @03:06AM (#33402807)
It seems pretty obvious to me that you never lived through the bad old days when compilers all did whatever they wanted.

Tell me again how much you care about C++20 when a library with a feature you want uses it but your toolchain doesn't support it.