Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far
by goatcode on Friday October 28, 2022 @05:49PM
(#33378389)
>I bet he wasn’t feeling too great about that bit of litigation the deal closing helped him escape.
>Maybe one of the cronies who were cozying up to him
>freedom isn’t free.
There are a few nasties in the article. This nerd writer got so angry his writing even got pretty sloppy in his section (3).
Seething is in fashion!
Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far
by markdown on Friday October 28, 2022 @06:04PM
(#33378556)
I don't think it's a secret that Musk has been cosying up to the Trump right for a while now.
It's only a nasty comment if you find those individuals deplorable, and Musk clearly doesn't.
Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far
by conorcleary on Friday October 28, 2022 @07:18PM
(#33379216)
Trump will never entirely forgive people like Musk who left his advisory committee(s).
Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far
by freejazz on Friday October 28, 2022 @06:35PM
(#33378838)
What about it is nasty? It doesn't say he endorsed those posters, it literally just says he interacted with him. I think the point is that he is interacting with these kinds of posters instead of, like doing something useful or relevant, or like anything else at all? I can see why you'd think it'd be nasty if you have an incredibly partisan view that has to sort everything into either being for or against something.
What a nasty comment from an otherwise fine article. A reply is not an endorsement, and not even linking the tweets in question really lets the author hide the evidence and twist the paragraph into whatever he wants it to mean. Besides, it's not like Justin Trudeau is lacking on things to attack him for.