Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far
by danans on Friday October 28, 2022 @03:57PM
(#33376917)
> Should Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, and Smith & Wesson be allowed to have Twitter accounts with hundreds of thousands of followers each?
> Any US politician who was in power between 2001 and 2020 did far more "material harm to others"[0] than any given teenager who wants to say racial slurs.
That comparison is invalid because those companies don't commit their purported harm on Twitter. Same with government officials. Even Kim Jong Un has a Twitter account https://twitter.com/official_kju
The "teenager" (or billionaire influencer) dropping racial slurs and either targeted or broad threats uses social media as the method of the harm they inflict. Mainstream social media companies are concerned with their platforms being used for harm.
Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far
by becquerel on Friday October 28, 2022 @03:08PM
(#33376080)
Yes, I think all of those entities and people should be deplatformed as well. And probably a lot more than deplatformed, but that's by the by.
Re:Elon Musk owns Twitter: The story so far
by giraffe_lady on Friday October 28, 2022 @03:29PM
(#33376460)
You're on the right track keep pushing!
Should Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, and Smith & Wesson be allowed to have Twitter accounts with hundreds of thousands of followers each?
Honestly, if you want to be really consistent, almost every world government should have its officials off Twitter. Any US politician who was in power between 2001 and 2020 did far more "material harm to others"[0] than any given teenager who wants to say racial slurs.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Afghanistan_(2001%E2%80...