Re:Why Is Hydroelectricity So Green, and yet Unfashionable?
by sidewndr46 on Thursday October 27, 2022 @11:22PM
(#33367263)
Wouldn't you need two reservoirs in that case? Otherwise where is the water being drained down to take advantage of the potential energy?
Re:Why Is Hydroelectricity So Green, and yet Unfashionable?
by pfdietz on Friday October 28, 2022 @12:45AM
(#33367773)
Yes, of course. Off-river pumped hydro involves two reservoirs.
Re:Why Is Hydroelectricity So Green, and yet Unfashionable?
by nirimda on Friday October 28, 2022 @06:38AM
(#33369708)
I think the confusion is a couple of comments up you said "There's a plan to put a reservoir for one on top of a mesa in the desert in Arizona" which is really confusing since of course they're planning to put a pair of reservoirs for one in the desert in Arizona. I guess only one is on top of the mesa though.
Re:Why Is Hydroelectricity So Green, and yet Unfashionable?
by sidewndr46 on Friday October 28, 2022 @07:46AM
(#33370174)
So at that point why use a river? Couldn't you just use ocean water? It's comparatively "free" and we aren't going to run out anytime soon.
Re:Why Is Hydroelectricity So Green, and yet Unfashionable?
by BurningFrog on Friday October 28, 2022 @10:55AM
(#33372130)
With a high enough plateau near an ocean, that should work.
I think those places are really rare though.
Water in this system is part of the capital cost (charging it up when you start), then a minor maintenance cost (replacing evaporation). Otherwise, unlike primary hydro, there is no large constant flow out of the system, and no need to be on a river.
The water lost to evaporation is at least an order of magnitude less than water evaporated from a nuclear plant of the same levelized power.