Re:GitHub Copilot investigation
by tommek4077 on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @03:33AM
(#33244133)
Oefrha just said that his, and probably yours, code is not worth that much if splitted into functions and commentary blocks. The value of software comes from its whole purpose, not your clever email-validation-regex you are so proud of.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
> not your clever email-validation-regex you are so proud of
Really? I challenge you to write a correct email validation regex.
Re:GitHub Copilot investigation
by forgotpwd16 on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @04:01AM
(#33244325)
>code is not worth that much if splitted into functions
Some algorithms in scientific computing require lots of effort to implement as nice, reusable, performant function. Those functions often more important than whatever the whole is doing because it's what most other people will be interested in using.
Then why use OSS licenses in the first place?
Let's just copy each other's code without attribution.
Re:GitHub Copilot investigation
by tommek4077 on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @04:45AM
(#33244593)
I am totally for this! Will bring eceryone forward in general without costing the society as much as this copyright bs.
Either that or people will stop posting their code publicly.
How many lines of code was the Oracle v Google case? 9?
Just so happens I think the case is bullshit. You would have a point if I supported Oracle.
Your lack of support of them doesn't change the facts.
Re:GitHub Copilot investigation
by batmanturkey on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @06:35AM
(#33245299)
Says you.
If it’s all just disposable code, WHY ISNT MICROSOFT TRAINING COPILOT ON WINDOWS AND OFFICE CODE?
Because that code isn't publicly available, just like every private repo on GitHub, and any other company's/person's proprietary/private code?
Re:GitHub Copilot investigation
by jakelazaroff on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @09:47AM
(#33247054)
Again, if I put code in a public repo on GitHub and don’t include a license that allows it, you cannot copy that code. It doesn’t matter that you’re able to access it.
Cannot is a strong term. Telling me there may be consequences would be more accurate.
I can claim fair use and short of an injunction there's nothing you can do to stop me.
Claiming fair use is not a fix all card you can play like that, there are a lot of nuences for that to hold on trial.
I'm allowed to read it and learn from it. To distill the core concepts and recreate it.
You as a human being, not you as a for profit company building a for profit product.
Re:GitHub Copilot investigation
by jakelazaroff on Tuesday October 18, 2022 @09:49AM
(#33247086)
Maybe I’m the worst programmer in the world. It doesn’t matter. My code is still my code, and if I don’t explicitly license it such that you can copy it, you’re not allowed to.