Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck
by badpun on Saturday October 15, 2022 @09:10AM
(#33214451)
Compared to general self-driving, it's relatively simple to make self-driving taxis work in just a couple of cities (preferably ones with minimum adversarial weather, too) - you just test the code against that particular dataset until it performes reasonably well, manually fixing the edge cases along the way if need be. It's still a monumental, multi-billion dollar project, but I would be surprised if it wasn't achievable.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck
by bastawhiz on Saturday October 15, 2022 @09:56PM
(#33220429)
Do you know that their tech is specifically optimized for those cities and won't work well elsewhere? Or is that speculation? As far as I'm aware, unless you were able to compare the performance of FSD against Waymo on an arbitrary road, you can't really make that argument.
Re:$100B later, autonomous vehicles are still a car-wreck
by badpun on Sunday October 16, 2022 @07:18AM
(#33222773)
I'm not talking about any specific tech solution. I'm merely pointing out that getting a self-driving taxi to work in a single city of your choice is a vastly simpler problem than general FSD.