Re:TikTok has an open computational chemistry position
by ggpsv on Friday October 14, 2022 @01:51PM
(#33206689)
"good" and "sociology" are surely carrying a lot of weight in that statement. What does "good" mean applied in this context?
I'm not sure I see the connection to sociology though, do yo mean behavioral economics?
Re:TikTok has an open computational chemistry position
by otabdeveloper4 on Friday October 14, 2022 @04:27PM
(#33208438)
Advertising today is figuring out the preferences and behavioral patterns of different social groups. It's not based on economics, it's mostly stats and probability theory.
Re:TikTok has an open computational chemistry position
by amelius on Friday October 14, 2022 @04:19PM
(#33208384)
But the knowledge we gain is only about triggering the bad paths of human brain, like addiction, greed, FOMO, etc. And who is "we" anyway, this stuff isn't public.
Re:TikTok has an open computational chemistry position
by otabdeveloper4 on Friday October 14, 2022 @04:25PM
(#33208422)
No, because literally every business that exists wants to advertise. (And also organizations that aren't businesses, like NGO's and government agencies and non-profits.)
Re:TikTok has an open computational chemistry position
by amelius on Friday October 14, 2022 @05:02PM
(#33208758)
Well, advertising only stimulates consumption, to the detriment of our planet.
Also, it is a loudness war, that is a race to the bottom in various ways.
As an individual business owner you want it, as society you don't.
Re:TikTok has an open computational chemistry position
by otabdeveloper4 on Sunday October 16, 2022 @12:25PM
(#33224838)
That's like saying "money only stimulates consumption and causes pollution".
Technically it is true, but good luck on your crusade of abolishing money.
Which is a good thing, since the sociology we had before clickable ads was unequivocally less scientific and useful.