Honestly, I think someone needs to ridicule the ridiculous.
Man takes a few years of school, reads a few books, and thinks he has a comprehensive idea of what happened supposedly millions of years ago.
Where were you when the earth was formed?
At this point, the omniscient creator is not any less provable. While it might sound ridiculous, there's no more proof for other ideas. After all, even if you subscribe to the Big Bang, where did all of that mass that went Bang! come from?
Imagine thinking that Galileo was pushing a remotely modern model of planetary motion when the Copernican model still had crystal spheres and perfect circles due to lack of several centuries of research into matters like gravity.
There where easily observable flaws on both sides of the argument.