Re:Researchers Find ‘Significant Rates’ of Sinking Ground in...
by kansface on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @07:09PM
(#33170453)
I've read that Houston isn't regulation free per se. Zoning was mostly replaced with neighbor associations of one sort or another which are just as restrictive with regard to dense development.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Researchers Find ‘Significant Rates’ of Sinking Ground in...
by foobarian on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @07:16PM
(#33170519)
I wonder what the scale involved is, and if compared to say Boston, the neighbor associations overlay roughly onto the suburb towns that all have highly customized regulations.
Re:Researchers Find ‘Significant Rates’ of Sinking Ground in...
by grepfru_it on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @07:26PM
(#33170603)
It depends on the area. Most go back to when the area was developed, some of them were voted into an association (eg historic heights), others are simply drawn at class lines (river oaks is entirely an association). The lines are really arbitrary. My house has a very minimal neighborhood restriction (no commercial front businesses) while my neighbors a few blocks away are required to maintain sidewalks, upkeep of yard, etc. Condos and townhomes obviously have HOAs as well. I believe a complete tear down is the only way to part ways with a deed restriction (which is why historic homes being remodeled are sometimes razed in the middle of the night)
Re:Researchers Find ‘Significant Rates’ of Sinking Ground in...
by ghaff on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @08:31PM
(#33171145)
Draw a radius outside of Boston/Cambridge for an hour drive (not in rush hour traffic--where many of the jobs are anyway) and there are many housing prices that are pretty reasonable. Not depressed ex-steel city in the Midwest reasonable but $300K for a single family home reasonable. And this gets into pretty rural areas without a lot of regulations. Of course, many especially closer in towns are much more regulated.