News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010) by compiler-guy on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @04:57PM (#33169154)
Strangely, There doesn't have to be just one with a lower score than the others.

One of the weirdest things about being human is that our preferences are neither rational nor consistent. The classic example in behavioural economics is with ice-cream flavors. If I prefer chocolate to strawberry and strawberry to vanilla, it doesn't follow that I prefer chocolate to vanilla. The preferences aren't transitive, and there doesn't exist a total preferences order.

Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010) by Brusco_RF on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @06:50PM (#33170289)
Thats a very interesting point that I've never considered. Where can I read more about that? Is there a study you can link me to?
Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010) by compiler-guy on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @10:17PM (#33171957)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11483173/ is one such study.

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/preferences/#Tra has an overview, note especially the paragraph about pair-wise comparisons.

Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010) by imtringued on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @02:34AM (#33173609)
But economists assume that preferences have a total order otherwise there wouldn't be a utility curve.
Re:Why you should never pay for online dating (OkCupid) (2010) by compiler-guy on Wednesday October 12, 2022 @01:46PM (#33180444)
Economists assume a utility curve in the same way that physicists assume spherical cows. They are a useful abstraction which help explain many things, but don't reflect reality completely.

https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/BehavioralEconomics.html