https://www.amazonredshiftresearchproject.org/slblog/2022-10...
To my eye, the missile struck the roof of the low building next to the Samsung tower. The buildings there, as far as I know from looking at them, are light commerical - restaurants, shops, etc.
The accuracy of Russian munitions has been demonstrably lower than NATO standard [1]. They’re also running low on good munitions, leading e.g. to land strikes by surface-to-air S-300s [2].
[1] https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/exclusive...
[2] https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/britain-says-russia-has...
They're from a precious small stockpile of Russian precision weapons. And they wasted it on civilian targets.
S300 cannot strike Kyiv, not from where the the frontline has moved.
They did not miss.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russias-defence-ministr...
>Russian defence ministry said in its daily briefing:
>"The goal of the strike has been achieved. All designated targets were hit,"
ergo this childrens playground was the intended target https://mobile.twitter.com/ArmanSoldin/status/15793548449511... https://twitter.com/mjluxmoore/status/1579357969577545729
I.e., did it hit a plausibly intended target, or miss?