Once again, any articles with incorrect content that you can cite?
Re:School vs. Wikipedia
by squeaky-clean on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @10:18PM
(#33171962)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-integer_base_of_numerati...
I know enough to know the examples for Base sqrt(2) are not correct, but I don't know enough to write a proper example.
For example if this is true "Base √2 behaves in a very similar way to base 2 as all one has to do to convert a number from binary into base √2 is put a zero digit in between every binary digit"
Then Base(10) 3 aka Base(2) 11 converted to Base(sqrt2) would be 101. But it is actually 1000.000001
> Once again,
This is your first comment to me
> Then Base(10) 3 aka Base(2) 11 converted to Base(sqrt2) would be 101. But it is actually 1000.000001
I don't see how. As per the expansion definition in the article 101 = 2+0+1 = 3
1000.000001 = sqrt(8) + epsilon.
PDEs are a significant enough thing that the article is probably correct. But once you get into more niche math articles, a lot of the writing is incorrect.