vs
"You don't speak for me"
One of those comments is speaking for a lot more people
It's "I can tell you that to us you're all the same" vs "You don't speak for the ~7.7B people not in the US."
One person is trying to speak for 7.7B and the other is advising against that.
It was an example of how to state unambiguously who was/was not being spoken for to contrast with the other statement. Maybe because I put it in quotes led you to think I was quoting someone, but it looked odd without to me.
Our free speech and privacy protections are not only stronger than China's, they're arguably stronger than Europe's too. There are some trade offs of course since Europe has GDPR and the right to be forgotten.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/23/technology/germany-intern...
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/police-arresting-nine-peo...
The reason China's situation is worse is because Europeans and Americans can and do protest this. It is not normalized and accepted. If you feel that America goes too far in how it exports its perceived brand of authoritarian, you should know that China is just getting started: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/oct/3/report-detai...