News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel Failed Science by idontknowifican on Thursday September 29, 2022 @06:58AM (#33018852)
how else would you make 13 related statements to the broadest possible group, allowing them to react to each one? is your lack of understanding a platform because you don’t like it showing?
Re:Intel Failed Science by DannyBee on Thursday September 29, 2022 @07:37AM (#33019164)
You are kidding, right?

Yes, how did discourse ever happen prior to twitter? We were all just cavepeople, smearing things on walls, until twitter saved us!

I also like that you think any of the 13 statements is even worth individually responding to, when in fact, each one is written in a way to drive reaction, rather than be part of an overall coherent story or thought.

They happen to be a reasonable writer, so they can make it overall seem reasonably coherent, but it's also 100% clear the writing would be better if they weren't trying to generate 13 statements that can be individually responded to.

The platform has not made it better.

Re:Intel Failed Science by greyw on Thursday September 29, 2022 @07:01AM (#33018869)
like I'm reacting now to your sentence