Also, the difference isn’t 10k. It’s hundreds of thousands of dollars at middling levels. It’s in the seven figures at the upper levels.
> job hopping means you’re never really staying at a company long enough to establish yourself and to own the long-term consequences of your actions
If you’re project hopping then you’re not owning long-term consequences either.
But .. in retrospect, I left a lot of money on the table. I also don’t see myself making the next jump (to vp) as I have seen no one do it .. vps come from outside where I am.
I am mulling an mba or emba but it is pretty expensive in time and money.
Online nano degrees seem to be too watered down to take seriously. Need to position self for late 2023.
But be really picky.
Isn't this what the top managers do? Seems to work for them.
But even at those 5-6 years recruiters/hiring managers start to notice, you better have some good story to explain since they will ask. They do care much more if hopping is recent compared to 5-10 years ago. For more senior roles its simply a no-go, I mean think about it - it would be a net loss for the company to hire such a person, and if its obvious from the start why cause this to yourself.
Companies want stability, especially on senior level. If they change, they want to be in control of the change and not the opposite. Instable persons won't bring that, you don't need 30 years of management experience to realize this.
My career trajectory after undergrad:
4 months: Project manager at a bank. Management development program that I left to join a startup in Berlin.
5 months, internship: promising startup in Berlin that I joined as intern. Founder passed away so the company almost went down under and they couldn't support me with visa.
1 year: Well-known German startup, notable turnkey projects. Left to home country due to family issues (closer to ageing relatives)
2 years 8 months: Rising Asian unicorn, notable turnkey projects, some good impact here. Left after a while to switch industry
3 months: Remote role at a US-based startup. Loved the time here and was actually able to scale a program. Laid-off along with half of the company due to investor pulling funds.
There are reasons behind every move. But this is not immediately evident to a recruiter and raises questions, more so in this market.
Now I'm job-searching while simultaneously freelance consulting on the side but as a generalist, non-tech, I'm somewhat jaded with job-hopping and want to aim for longer run at a stable company.
In the first few years after college it’s not a big deal to change companies several times in short succession because you’re not really a key player in an organization.
Once you reach the leadership and middle management roles, job hopping means you’re never really staying at a company long enough to establish yourself and to own the long-term consequences of your actions. It’s very easy to come in, make a mess, and then leave before any consequences catch up to you. It’s much harder to stay and own things for 3 year or more.
> Also a good callout that this is extra true for senior roles where it will be more complicated to replace a short-tenured leader.
Well said. It’s not a big deal if one of several similarly qualified developers rotates out of a team. It is a bigger deal if your teams have a new leader every 12 months because you hired people who can’t stay in one place very long. Even as an employee it gets painful and worrisome when management is changing over frequently and nobody really knows why.
How many times have we seen “Ask HN” posts where people complain that they’ve had a new manager every 12 months and everyone comments that it’s a red flag? As a company, you can’t afford to hire flakey senior leaders and managers who have a history of disappearing the second someone offers them a slightly higher salary. Keep them compensated, of course, but there will always be recruiters hunting for someone willing to jump ship in exchange for a $10K signing bonus.