News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Citing new evidence, families sue feds, Raytheon, Lockheed over 1996 TWA crash. Parent comment

Re:Citing new evidence, families sue feds, Raytheon, Lockhee... by ceejayoz on Sunday September 25, 2022 @02:10PM (#32974174)
> I went through a few years in which I saw many anti-aircraft missiles...

How many exploding, breaking-up 747s, though?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Citing new evidence, families sue feds, Raytheon, Lockhee... by 13of40 on Sunday September 25, 2022 @02:14PM (#32974215)
I don't think we ever had the training budget for that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Citing new evidence, families sue feds, Raytheon, Lockhee... by salawat on Sunday September 25, 2022 @02:26PM (#32974369)
Come now. If you've seen one detonation compromosing a man made structure, nevermind one that is carefully constructed specifically to repeatedly take off under its own power you've seen about all you need to see.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Citing new evidence, families sue feds, Raytheon, Lockhee... by ceejayoz on Sunday September 25, 2022 @02:47PM (#32974600)
Quite simply, “that looks like a missile” and “that is a missile” are not the same. Especially from 20+ miles away.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Citing new evidence, families sue feds, Raytheon, Lockhee... by mirekrusin on Sunday September 25, 2022 @02:57PM (#32974736)
> Quite simply, “that looks like a missile” and “that is a missile” are not the same. Especially from 20+ miles away.

It could be superman.

[ Parent | on HN ]