Re:Citing new evidence, families sue feds, Raytheon, Lockhee...
by bombcar on Sunday September 25, 2022 @02:02PM
(#32974056)
Wouldn’t the CIA first ask if you needed it to be or not be enemy action?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Citing new evidence, families sue feds, Raytheon, Lockhee...
by ceejayoz on Sunday September 25, 2022 @02:04PM
(#32974079)
Sure, if you come to the CIA with "we need you to fake a report", they'll likely fake a report. In that scenario, though, I strongly suspect the 95% reconstructed fuselage wouldn't have been permitted to be a NTSB training aid for two decades afterwards.
Re:Citing new evidence, families sue feds, Raytheon, Lockhee...
by bombcar on Sunday September 25, 2022 @02:09PM
(#32974161)
How many other air remains had such done to it? 25 years seems a long time.
Re:Citing new evidence, families sue feds, Raytheon, Lockhee...
by ceejayoz on Sunday September 25, 2022 @02:14PM
(#32974217)
MH17 was similarly reconstructed.
https://www.reuters.com/world/mh17-aircraft-wreckage-viewed-...
Modern laser scanning makes retaining the original long-term less important, apparently.