Not an insane idea? How much lift can a pair of wings generate without thrust or stabilization? If the plane broke apart in mid-air, as you say, the engines would have shut down immediately. The only "thrust" the back section had remaining is the inertial energy from its moving mass. Without attitude control and with a huge gaping hole in the front acting as an air brake, I struggle to see how the plane could have climbed any more than a few meters before stalling.

If it were that obvious, cover-up would be impossible. You’d have had hundreds of aeronautical engineers screaming to everyone who’d listen.

Well there were thousands of architects and engineers screaming ideas about 9/11. Doesn’t mean much

https://efiles.portlandoregon.gov/Record/7884068/File/Docume...

> I struggle to see how the plane could have climbed any more than a few meters before stalling.

This is because you understand neither aerodynamics, or what happens to planes during failures, specifically big ones where when the front falls off.

Thankfully, other people do.

This is not a good-faith comment. This is incredibly dismissive without providing any supporting information. Do better.

Sorry, just bored of the self-centered "I don't understand this thing, so therefore it can't be true" mentality that seems to be a common trait across most conspiracy theorists.