News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks... by 1270018080 on Thursday September 22, 2022 @10:38PM (#32947356)
But there isn't an enlightened centrist middle ground here where we allow all speech off of principle. First off, because that has never happened in American history (or any country's history?). So there is no good ol days to look back on when speech was more free. Second of all, people are way too stupid to process information on their own. Governments are at their best when they are paternalistic, that's why we have seatbelts, no lead in gasoline etc. Of course the question is "who can decide what's good for you?" but it's definitely not Florida's government. Or the demographic that frequently shows up on r/hermancainaward
Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks... by Dracophoenix on Friday September 23, 2022 @01:15AM (#32948308)
> Governments are at their best when they are paternalistic, that's why we have seatbelts, no lead in gasoline etc.

The same paternalism has justified poisoning one's own people in a "war" against alcohol, dictated who was allowed to have sex with whom in privacy of their own home, and resulted in human experimentation for the supposed betterment of society.

Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks... by a-user-you-like on Friday September 23, 2022 @07:22AM (#32950368)
Of course the law should dictate who you sleep with. In the 13 colonies adultery was rightly a capital crime.