News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks... by juve1996 on Thursday September 22, 2022 @08:31PM (#32946453)
This is the problem today.

Everyone says they want free speech. But deep down they don't. Some don't want gay marriage written in books, and some don't want anti-vaxxers to post misinformation. Those are 2 sides of the same coin.

Freedom of speech is a critical cornerstone of liberal government. The fact that so many sides want to reduce this right is what is scary.

Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks... by intrasight on Thursday September 22, 2022 @11:44PM (#32947778)
Very well said - and inspired me to chime in.

We have much less freedom than we think, and the freedom we do have we pay a very high price for. I often use the phrase "What price freedom?" in conversations, and unfortunately most don't understand what it means.

Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks... by rhn_mk1 on Saturday September 24, 2022 @10:03AM (#32962706)
What does it mean?
Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks... by intrasight on Sunday September 25, 2022 @11:47PM (#32979182)
I think of it as having these meanings:

1. Your freedom can cause problems to me an to society as a whole

2. We pay much in blood and treasure to maintain our freedom

3. There are unintended consequences and knock-on effects to most all rules regarding freedom.

Or to generalize: "Freedom isn't free"

Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks... by 1270018080 on Thursday September 22, 2022 @10:38PM (#32947356)
But there isn't an enlightened centrist middle ground here where we allow all speech off of principle. First off, because that has never happened in American history (or any country's history?). So there is no good ol days to look back on when speech was more free. Second of all, people are way too stupid to process information on their own. Governments are at their best when they are paternalistic, that's why we have seatbelts, no lead in gasoline etc. Of course the question is "who can decide what's good for you?" but it's definitely not Florida's government. Or the demographic that frequently shows up on r/hermancainaward
Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks... by Dracophoenix on Friday September 23, 2022 @01:15AM (#32948308)
> Governments are at their best when they are paternalistic, that's why we have seatbelts, no lead in gasoline etc.

The same paternalism has justified poisoning one's own people in a "war" against alcohol, dictated who was allowed to have sex with whom in privacy of their own home, and resulted in human experimentation for the supposed betterment of society.

Re:Florida to Supreme Court: Let us regulate social networks... by a-user-you-like on Friday September 23, 2022 @07:22AM (#32950368)
Of course the law should dictate who you sleep with. In the 13 colonies adultery was rightly a capital crime.