News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The road to realistic full-body deepfakes by whatshisface on Thursday September 22, 2022 @05:33PM (#32944899)
In a sense, Ronald Regan was not real. All of his speeches were written by someone else, and he relied heavily on advisors. He was a figurehead for his administration to a greater extent than most presidents before and after. He was one of the few presidents that may have actually been innocent of the bad stuff that went on in the white house during his presidency (Iran-Contra), because he never showed any indication of really understanding it the way Nixon understood Watergate or LBJ understood Vietnam.
Re:The road to realistic full-body deepfakes by tomcam on Thursday September 22, 2022 @11:49PM (#32947815)
This is hilariously untrue. He was very well known for his “a time for choosing“ speech in 1964 introducing Barry Goldwater. It had the same impact as Obama‘s speech before the Democrats in 2004. As a union leader he gave many, many well received speeches that he wrote himself. He was politically active as a union Democrat for decades before becoming governor of California and wrote scores of speeches at that time.

From about the 1940s to the 1960s he made many radio addresses that he wrote himself. He was politically very active, touring the country and doing a lot of speeches on his own.

As a president he absolutely had the best speech writers of his time, but he went over each speech meticulously and gave feedback the writers claimed was expert and welcome.

One of his speech writers actually published a book that showed photographs of Reagan’s own handwritten notes for his speeches. There are thousands of them in his presidential library.

Re:The road to realistic full-body deepfakes by hodgesrm on Friday September 23, 2022 @07:55PM (#32958457)
I think you also have to give Reagan credit for hiring gifted writers to shape his communications. Peggy Noonan is just one of several.
Re:The road to realistic full-body deepfakes by tomcam on Saturday September 24, 2022 @01:43AM (#32959988)
Thought I did?

> As a president he absolutely had the best speech writers of his time,

Re:The road to realistic full-body deepfakes by hodgesrm on Thursday September 29, 2022 @01:21AM (#33016742)
Yes you did! Sorry for restating what you had communicated more parsimoniously. (I'll be looking for somebody to help write my HN comments for me.)
Re:The road to realistic full-body deepfakes by romeros on Thursday September 22, 2022 @11:16PM (#32947602)
I saw Ronald Reagan's interview with Jimmy Carson. He seemed to be pretty sharp and funny.
Re:The road to realistic full-body deepfakes by pwinnski on Friday September 23, 2022 @04:09PM (#32956466)
As another commenter has already pointed out, your assertions about his speeches is very much untrue. Also very much untrue is his lack of complicity in the Iran-Contra crimes.

He was both much better (as a writer) and worse (as a law-breaker) than your depiction of him.

Re:The road to realistic full-body deepfakes by munk-a on Thursday September 22, 2022 @06:01PM (#32945193)
Can I briefly and humorously boil your statement above down to "Ronald Reagen was probably innocent by way of sheer ignorance"?
Re:The road to realistic full-body deepfakes by parker_mountain on Thursday September 22, 2022 @10:19PM (#32947241)
If you consider the latter years of his presidency, as well as his immediate post-presidency retirement, it'd be more accurate to say:

"Ronald Reagen was probably innocent by way of Alzheimers"

A lot of people who met him during the last two years of his presidency described what we now know to be early symptoms of Alzheimers. He also came out publicly as having it not 5 years after leaving office.

Re:The road to realistic full-body deepfakes by tomcam on Thursday September 22, 2022 @11:53PM (#32947843)
You can, and you would be gravely mistaken.
Re:The road to realistic full-body deepfakes by advantager on Thursday September 22, 2022 @06:59PM (#32945722)
Ignorantia juris non excusat
Re:The road to realistic full-body deepfakes by unglaublich on Thursday September 22, 2022 @10:08PM (#32947190)
That's elitist for: Ignorance of the law is no excuse.