Re:Lose weight the slow and incredibly difficult way
by Kranar on Thursday September 22, 2022 @05:16PM
(#32944729)
What's hilarious is that jasonpeacock didn't just avoid reading the article, but it's clear that he also avoided reading the very comment he replied to.
It's like people just want to get outraged over nothing.
Re:Lose weight the slow and incredibly difficult way
by tsimionescu on Thursday September 22, 2022 @05:44PM
(#32945012)
And not once, but twice!
Even though it's a lot of fun, it's honestly a bit eye opening to see how little some people engage with the substance of the comments they are replying to...
Re:Lose weight the slow and incredibly difficult way
by jasonpeacock on Thursday September 22, 2022 @06:27PM
(#32945442)
ok, jokes on me :) I did the read the article (and have bought both books).
but I've seen so much garbage about CICO that I took the response seriously..
Re:Lose weight the slow and incredibly difficult way
by elil17 on Thursday September 22, 2022 @07:58PM
(#32946211)
To be clear I agree with you. I find “CICO” a totally dissatisfying explanation of obesity, not because I don’t think it’s true, but rather because I think it fails to provide any insight that’s actionable from a public health perspective.
Re:Lose weight the slow and incredibly difficult way
by tsimionescu on Thursday September 22, 2022 @06:34PM
(#32945493)
Yes, I've been there once or twice myself, no judgment on you personally! The amount of people responding this way was a bit surprising though. I will note that I completely share your feelings about the boring version of CICO.
Discussing fat loss is really short sighted when ejecting a little bit of mass could help the entire population lose some weight forever.