Re:Pentagon opens sweeping review of clandestine psychologic...
by kilroy123 on Monday September 19, 2022 @12:01PM
(#32900126)
All empires eventually decline.
Re:Pentagon opens sweeping review of clandestine psychologic...
by fortuna86 on Monday September 19, 2022 @07:10PM
(#32905399)
What colonies do the US maintain overseas? Or is the word "empire" just slang in this case ?
Re:Pentagon opens sweeping review of clandestine psychologic...
by kilroy123 on Monday September 19, 2022 @07:50PM
(#32905737)
Re:Pentagon opens sweeping review of clandestine psychologic...
by fortuna86 on Tuesday September 20, 2022 @01:30AM
(#32908001)
All those territories count their people as US citizens (except American Samoa they need to fix that), most have voted to either be part of the US or enjoy popular support of remaining so.
That's not what empires do.
Re:Pentagon opens sweeping review of clandestine psychologic...
by jonnybgood on Tuesday September 20, 2022 @12:00AM
(#32907501)
You could of just said five island territories. Three in the Pacific and two in the Caribbean.
Re:Pentagon opens sweeping review of clandestine psychologic...
by sargerage on Monday September 19, 2022 @07:34PM
(#32905612)
Any country hosting US military bases and aligning itself with US foreign policy: Japan, South Korea, Australia, etc.
Pretty standard definition of an empire.
Re:Pentagon opens sweeping review of clandestine psychologic...
by jonnybgood on Tuesday September 20, 2022 @12:02AM
(#32907516)
They could kick the US out at anytime. They won't because they want the US to be there. Not the standard definition at all.
Re:Pentagon opens sweeping review of clandestine psychologic...
by fortuna86 on Tuesday September 20, 2022 @01:34AM
(#32908018)
US bases pay rent on land, employ locals, and will instantly shut down if the host country asks them to (after having been invited to enter to begin with). Of course there are cold war era exceptions, but this is the norm:
> The U.S. base at the Bishkek airport had become a regular source of criticism from various Kyrgyz politicians and, with heavy Russian influence, it also closed in 2014.
https://www.rferl.org/a/u-s-military-bases-in-central-asia-p...
Again, doesn't sound like any Empire i've read about in a history book.
And while it's true that U.S. cultural "force projection" hasn't weakened; they are being severely squeezed when it comes to trade dominance (https://merchantmachine.co.uk/china-vs-us/) and monetary dominance (see James Rickards' books).
America still has its hegemony, but the notion that it's declining is very much mainstream in academia (https://www.routledge.com/Americas-Allies-and-the-Decline-of...). Worse, its national security institutions have lost credibility among a significant portion of its electorate (MAGA people), and its military hegemony is now opposed by both populist left (pacifists) and populist right (non-interventionists). They're being squeezed both abroad and at home.