News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Ethereum merge is done by polygamous_bat on Thursday September 15, 2022 @07:41AM (#32850253)
Yes, although more concretely put, people pay for nothing of value. See [1] [2] for some more historical occurrences.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania [2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beanie_Babies

Before you get all worked up about "crypto is better than tulips!", I'm primarily responding to your question by saying that _just because_ people are willing to pay (sometimes exorbitant amounts) for something doesn't imply it has that value.

Re:The Ethereum merge is done by CTDOCodebases on Friday September 16, 2022 @06:16AM (#32864282)
People will pay for something that they value but others do not.

I prefer to think of value as a function of rarity and utility. I'll skip over rarity but utility can include the possibility of selling something for more than it was purchased at some time in the future.

If someone pays an exorbitant amount for something it has that value to them at the time of purchasing. Whether that value is reflected in the market price or persists over time is something else though. Value is not static. Value is dynamic. You can observe this both personally and in the markets.