News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Web UI for Stable Diffusion by drexlspivey on Friday September 09, 2022 @06:03PM (#32785432)
How is M1/M2 support for SD? Is there a significant performance drop? Presumably you would be able to buy a 32GB M2 and be future proof because of the shared memory between CPU/GPU.
Re:A Web UI for Stable Diffusion by jwitthuhn on Friday September 09, 2022 @10:21PM (#32787111)
I recently switched from a CPU-only version to this repo release 1.13: https://github.com/lstein/stable-diffusion

The original txt2img and img2img scripts are a bit wonky and not all of the samplers work, but as long as you stick to dream.py and use a working sampler, I have had good luck with k_lms, then it works great and runs way faster than the cpu version.

Works great on 32gb ram but I'm honestly tempted to sell this one and get a 64gb model once the m2 pros come around. This is capable of eating up all the ram you can throw at it to do multiple pictures simultaneously.

Re:A Web UI for Stable Diffusion by jjcon on Friday September 09, 2022 @06:13PM (#32785515)
In my setup at least it runs essentially in CPU mode since there is no CUDA acceleration available and metal support is really messy right now. So while quite slow I don't run into memory issues at least. It runs much faster on my desktop GPU but that has more constraints (until I upgrade my personal 1080 to a 3090 one of these days).
Re:A Web UI for Stable Diffusion by totoglazer on Friday September 09, 2022 @06:21PM (#32785605)
There was a long thread last week. It’s honestly pretty good if you follow the instructions. 30-40 seconds/image.
Re:A Web UI for Stable Diffusion by hombre_fatal on Friday September 09, 2022 @07:19PM (#32786052)
Yeah, I followed the instructions on a M1 Macbook Pro (Monterey 12.5.1) and it worked without extra effort. 30-40 seconds per image. I have 32GB but image generation doesn’t even use half of it. The hard part has been to generate prompts that do what I want.