Apple doesn't believe in enabling illegal piracy, which is 99.9999999% of the usage of torrents.

Twitter, web browsers, and YouTube are fine on the App Store.

A developer might want to offload bandwidth hosting costs to p2p.

I've used torrents to download software so that the provider didn't need to pay bandwidth to share their software.

There are completely legal and reasonable reasons torrenting exists. They're excellent at making huge downloads possible with the more efficient bandwidth. Instead of that, we have an ecosystem of "installers" that exist purely to download massive files to install.

There are many things with technically legal purposes that people often choose not to associate with because they find the cons outweigh the pros. This is that.

I wish torrenting for general downloads was more popular. I had unstable internet that would make downloading anything over 100MB impossible.

Slap a torrent together of the same payload and it'd be guaranteed not to stall/error because of the network.

I agree, I wish they were more common, but you don't need torrents to solve any issues with resuming downloads. HTTP supports sufficient functionality to accomplish this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Range_requ...

    while; wget -c http://...; end

(From memory, may need tweaking.)

Cons of cryptocurrency outweigh the Pros. Yet these apps are on the app store.

And I'd be happy if they weren't, but people would be more upset over that than torrent clients.

Maybe so. Judgement is subjective.

How so?

> enabling illegal piracy

> YouTube

Hmmm.

Because YouTube "is 99.9999999%" piracy? Hmmmm.

Piracy on YouTube isn't 0%, obviously. But it isn't in the same league, or comparable to torrenting.

And browsers. Go watch series has everything.

Rip. Mix. Burn.

.....riiight.

> Apple doesn't believe in software that exposes their users to content outside of their walled garden.

Mobile Safari ordinarily exposes users to content, media, and applications outside Apple's walled garden, namely, the World Wide Web. Apple's walled garden only restricts the platform to protect users' system security and privacy, only allowing the installation of software from Apple's package manager, the AppStore. Apple does not restrict content, media, or applications.

Contrary to popular belief, dissent is a very good thing. If everyone always agreed, there would never be progress. It is only through dissent that things can improve. Further, I, for one, appreciate cynicism, as it often is efficient in communicating valid criticism. But as far as I am aware, no one cares for inaccuracy and most despise bullshit, libel and slander. Carry on.

This is so corpo-double-speaky that I'm almost worried it's satire going over my head.

pretty sure it's just HN being HN

Translation: Apple doesn't believe in the freedom to get for free, what they could restrict and charge you for themselves.