News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Deviations from Chromium (features we disable or remove) by illiac786 on Wednesday September 07, 2022 @10:48PM (#32760506)
I read this and I am surprised the link fragment is sent to the DNS server, that is not how I understood DNS worked.

Why isn't only the FQDN sent?

Re:Deviations from Chromium (features we disable or remove) by password4321 on Thursday September 08, 2022 @03:25PM (#32770740)
It's not the link fragment portion of the URL in the address bar that is sent to DNS, it is DNS requests from additional lazily-loaded content that is pulled up when the browser jumps down to it.

Someone else went into detail: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32742504

Re:Deviations from Chromium (features we disable or remove) by illiac786 on Friday September 09, 2022 @01:42AM (#32775704)
This requires the attacker to have third party content on the page you are trying to get the user to scroll through, that is a huge assumption no?

The password web page example is here highly unlikely: if the attacker injected his external content on the password web page, he has already a very strong position - getting users to click on links is not a logical next step, the attacker has far better avenues I would assume.

At least that's my understanding.