Re:Covid: Summary of lab-origin hypothesis
by Moodles on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @05:25PM
(#32743401)
Obviously the person you’re responding to doesn’t think covid is conscious and has motivations…
Re:Covid: Summary of lab-origin hypothesis
by goatcode on Wednesday September 07, 2022 @10:24AM
(#32751029)
> temporarily beneficial
This was the crux of my point.
Re:Covid: Summary of lab-origin hypothesis
by tedivm on Wednesday September 07, 2022 @03:06PM
(#32755019)
Then your point makes no sense.
Re:Covid: Summary of lab-origin hypothesis
by omniglottal on Thursday September 08, 2022 @08:27AM
(#32764508)
Please work on your reading comprehension and stop being rude.
To put it another way, a cell mutates based off of random chance. It doesn't have desires. We only have to go back as far as 1918 to see an example of a virus that could not have been engineered and was highly transmissible and highly deadly. As you say, in the long term that doesn't work out- the virus in that case mutated to be much more mild- which is why you won't see viruses like that surviving for long. But it still doesn't make sense to assume viruses evolve according to a motivation based logic.