News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Covid: Summary of lab-origin hypothesis by tedivm on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @05:17PM (#32743311)
Nature, and evolution, don't follow motive based logic. Random mutations that are temporarily beneficial but are detrimental to the long term do happen.

To put it another way, a cell mutates based off of random chance. It doesn't have desires. We only have to go back as far as 1918 to see an example of a virus that could not have been engineered and was highly transmissible and highly deadly. As you say, in the long term that doesn't work out- the virus in that case mutated to be much more mild- which is why you won't see viruses like that surviving for long. But it still doesn't make sense to assume viruses evolve according to a motivation based logic.

Re:Covid: Summary of lab-origin hypothesis by Moodles on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @05:25PM (#32743401)
Obviously the person you’re responding to doesn’t think covid is conscious and has motivations…
Re:Covid: Summary of lab-origin hypothesis by goatcode on Wednesday September 07, 2022 @10:24AM (#32751029)
> temporarily beneficial

This was the crux of my point.

Re:Covid: Summary of lab-origin hypothesis by tedivm on Wednesday September 07, 2022 @03:06PM (#32755019)
Then your point makes no sense.
Re:Covid: Summary of lab-origin hypothesis by omniglottal on Thursday September 08, 2022 @08:27AM (#32764508)
Please work on your reading comprehension and stop being rude.