The idea that this is what "we agreed as a society" is absurd. The justice system is a thing that evolved in our society largely as a result of powerful people feeding it when it protects their interests.
The people elect representatives to pass and/or change laws.
What you're saying is we should disregard voting because you know best - an argument famously supported by every genocidal maniac in the 20th century.
I loathe about American exceptionalism, but the constitution and American legal system truly is: https://youtu.be/Ggz_gd--UO0
Certainly online harassment leading to someone committing suicide is.
KF is a platform that facilitates these activities.
Not in the USA, no.
https://www.popehat.com/2015/05/19/how-to-spot-and-critique-...
> Certainly online harassment leading to someone committing suicide is.
Harassment can be, but here "harassment" means making threats of violence, not just criticizing someone. That falls under "true threats":
https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1025/true-threats
Note that the older "fighting words" doctrine is probably obsolete and even then only applies to face-to-face conversation. For more on that see the prior link to Popehat.
Documenting people's lives is not harassment.
To have all of your privacy taken away from you.
The US is rather unique in their absolutist view of free speech and other countries don't work the same way. Generally, for example, this would be a violation of UK law.
If you want to prohibit speech to white supremacists, fine, let’s pass a law and if it doesn’t hold constitutional muster, go ahead convince everyone to amend the constitution. But since our founding fathers made this process difficult on purpose, let’s take a different approach: that’s what social justice is. It is anti-democratic mob lunacy where corporations and governments are playing a proxy authoritarian game.