Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by pjc50 on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @11:08AM
(#32663076)
Possibly, but as soon as it became a thing it would be raided by the police, as per what happened to the Black Panthers.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by wahnfrieden on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @11:12AM
(#32663139)
Police are also a reason the left need a strong gun culture (I mean we are talking about the same groups of people, police and right wing extremists, terrorist groups, white supremacist gangs etc). BP didn’t go far enough and were hamstrung by lack of support from the left due to racial division within working class and those in poverty
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by colpabar on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @11:43AM
(#32663709)
Good thing the left is so supportive of the working class now lol
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by wahnfrieden on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @11:46AM
(#32663760)
It’s bad as ever, I’m not suggesting we’ve reversed those divisions. And now the left have gained an anti-gun stance on top of it, and in typical liberal fashion, have started with giving up their own individual gun ownership before addressing ownership at large in society
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by Chris2048 on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @08:30PM
(#32670190)
I'd argue that while initially having more guns causes the probability of being raided to go up, with enough guns that starts to fall.
The police/FBI raid you because you are a threat to them. Become enough of a threat, and they will think twice about raiding you.
Of course you won't win against the military, but that becomes an issue of popular support - the BP didn't have enough political power at the time. I expect this is the reason the response to the Capitol raid was muted - As much as a military response could be justified, doing so against a reasonably well supported group would escalate the situation.
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by wahnfrieden on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @08:37PM
(#32670241)
gun ownership itself doesn’t make an organization a threat to the police or fbi as is utterly evident. nor does the possession of guns itself cause organized criminalized activity to be treated with severe force, as is also utterly evident
also bear in mind the military doesn’t operate with nearly as much ease on america’s own population, when you’re comparing pig threat to movements or peoples in the US. there’s also your neighbor to worry about
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by Chris2048 on Thursday September 01, 2022 @05:43AM
(#32674135)
This is in the context of being a targeted organisation, such as the BP.
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by wahnfrieden on Thursday September 01, 2022 @07:41AM
(#32674987)
pretty sus to tell dissidents they should all disarm to protect themselves
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by Chris2048 on Thursday September 01, 2022 @11:23AM
(#32677706)
maybe, but what has that got to do with this thread?
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by wahnfrieden on Thursday September 01, 2022 @12:55PM
(#32679293)
you began the thread saying the left saves themselves from attack by de-arming themselves
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by Chris2048 on Thursday September 01, 2022 @12:58PM
(#32679348)
You should read to the end of that sentence. I also don't consider it to apply only to the left.
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by wahnfrieden on Thursday September 01, 2022 @03:12PM
(#32681534)
got it sorry had your next BP comment as thread root
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by Chris2048 on Thursday September 01, 2022 @03:19PM
(#32681620)
np
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by wahnfrieden on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @03:27PM
(#32667115)
btw BP were raided when they started taking direct action to support their communities through programs like the free breakfast service. guns didn’t do BP in, socialism did