News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Big [Censored] Theory by Spivak on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @01:07AM (#32646816)
That doesn’t matter since you are allowed to copy your own digital media for the purpose of dealing with that exact situation. A rental shop would legally be allowed to make a backup copy of every disc they have in case it gets damaged.
Re:The Big [Censored] Theory by Thorrez on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @01:15AM (#32646857)
Hmm, are they allowed to rent out the backup copy if the original breaks? I thought rental was based on first sale doctrine and backup copies are based on fair use. I'm not sure if you can combine the 2.
Re:The Big [Censored] Theory by bryanrasmussen on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @02:46AM (#32647352)
well I don't know either, but what purpose would a video rental shop have in making a backup copy in case the primary gets damaged if not to rent it out?
Re:The Big [Censored] Theory by Thorrez on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @01:34AM (#32658754)
Hmm, actually researching this more, I don't think it's actually legal for a regular individual or corporation to make a copy of a DVD movie for backup purposes. I don't think it actually falls under fair use.

You can backup software[1][2] (allowed by law, not fair use) but not movies.

[1] https://www.southerncaliforniapatents.com/articles/2014/10/0...

[2] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/117

Re:The Big [Censored] Theory by kshacker on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @03:09AM (#32647490)
Well once the disk was worn out, and you had a backup, you could re-sell the backup

Of course this may be abuse of the fair use backup copy, but when talking digital, we are anyways inventing philosophies.

Other way could be the backup could be entitled to "one last rental" to recoup last 4 bucks or so. I think that would be fair use but others may not.