News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The coming tsunami of fakery by freediver on Friday August 26, 2022 @03:48PM (#32611935)
> But an outdated article doesn't guarantee this to be true.

Nor does a new article on a "review" site monetized with affiliate links guarantee it. So who do you trust more? Older but honest review from an expert or a new affilate driven review? Kagi choses the former as likelier to be more valuable to the user in this case.

Re:The coming tsunami of fakery by lWaterboardCats on Friday August 26, 2022 @05:32PM (#32613004)
The issue still is that there objectively could be better headphones released after 2014.

If I saw a photograph of all the cellphones from 2004, I can pick out the best cellphone, this doesn’t mean that the best cellphone from 2004 is still the best cellphone.

It’s implied that “best” usually means what is “best” for what people need today as those needs evolve drastically over time and especially with tech products.

Re:The coming tsunami of fakery by slg on Saturday August 27, 2022 @01:20PM (#32621112)
Why is that the choice? You are assuming an expert has not written an honest review of the headphone market in 8 years.
Re:The coming tsunami of fakery by freediver on Saturday August 27, 2022 @03:47PM (#32622478)
It would presumeably surface in the results too.