News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Police used a baby’s DNA to investigate its father for a ... by 2OEH8eoCRo0 on Monday August 15, 2022 @03:42PM (#32474361)
Tell me what part of HIPAA you think was violated.
Re:Police used a baby’s DNA to investigate its father for a ... by hoppyhoppy2 on Monday August 15, 2022 @03:48PM (#32474465)
Tell me why everyone spells HIPAA wrong. (It's the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)
Re:Police used a baby’s DNA to investigate its father for a ... by Someone1234 on Monday August 15, 2022 @03:53PM (#32474535)
Because the people often mis-citing HIPAA also know so little about it they don't even know what it stands for.

People think it is a magical incarnation, that they can wield in any vaguely relevant discussion.

Whereas I'd argue that HIPAA is a very weak law with poor enforcement. It is a "better than nothing" law and nothing more[0]. It isn't some kind of medical data super weapon like people believe.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Insurance_Portability_a...

Re:Police used a baby’s DNA to investigate its father for a ... by smegsicle on Monday August 15, 2022 @03:54PM (#32474547)
want to spell it like hippo
Re:Police used a baby’s DNA to investigate its father for a ... by johnbellone on Monday August 15, 2022 @03:55PM (#32474556)
This is a gray area for sure, but I'd argue that it violates the [HITECH Act][^1] Part D (privacy & disclosure). The rub here is that the patient, newborn in this case, did not consent because they were underage. In many cases this blood sample is taken "by default" and requires an opt-out due to religious objection.

[^1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Information_Technology_...

Re:Police used a baby’s DNA to investigate its father for a ... by asdff on Monday August 15, 2022 @04:39PM (#32475052)
Legal guardians consented.
Re:Police used a baby’s DNA to investigate its father for a ... by pseudalopex on Monday August 15, 2022 @05:08PM (#32475397)
The article said it's mandatory.
Re:Police used a baby’s DNA to investigate its father for a ... by 2OEH8eoCRo0 on Monday August 15, 2022 @08:05PM (#32477442)
Was the legal guardian served a warrant signed by a judge?
Re:Police used a baby’s DNA to investigate its father for a ... by pseudalopex on Tuesday August 16, 2022 @06:02AM (#32480976)
Not likely. Was this an indirect argument the mandate is unconstitutional?