Re:The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root ...
by gfxgirl on Saturday August 13, 2022 @04:44AM
(#32448018)
That's why I don't install the app. It works fine in the browser and I don't have to install anything.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root ...
by lokedhs on Saturday August 13, 2022 @05:15AM
(#32448158)
On the desktop perhaps, but I tried for the longest time to connect using a mobile browser and it just wouldn't let me.
I ended up having to go to a computer to connect with using a browser.
Re:The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root ...
by hef19898 on Saturday August 13, 2022 @05:24AM
(#32448202)
The anti pattern of forcing apps down tge throats of mobile users should be illegal. Looking at you LinkedIn, Instagram and those others I missed.
Re:The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root ...
by lostlogin on Saturday August 13, 2022 @11:20AM
(#32450684)
I installed ‘Banish’ on iOS to get rid of the nagging dialogues. I haven’t seen one since.
No affiliation.
Re:The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root ...
by madeofpalk on Saturday August 13, 2022 @05:34AM
(#32448243)
No, it should not be illegal.
Re:The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root ...
by hef19898 on Saturday August 13, 2022 @05:48AM
(#32448315)
Why not? So that tech companies can collect more data? Because I don't see any reason why browser solutions aren't viable in the age of overpowered smartphones and 5g networks.
Re:The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root ...
by madeofpalk on Saturday August 13, 2022 @08:51AM
(#32449411)
What does this law actually look like? What's the legislation? "You're not allowed to link to a native app from a website"? Are you saying iOS universal links - twitter.com links opening in the twitter app - should be illegal?
I don't understand how you can legislate against this without also banning a bunch of legitimate use cases.
Re:The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root ...
by hef19898 on Saturday August 13, 2022 @09:24AM
(#32449648)
We did it with browsers, didn't we? And we rightfully complain when MS is defaulting back to Edge after an update. Sure, LinkedIn, ask me once if I want ro use the app. Accept that I stick to the browser / website and don't make the website experience arbitarily worse on mobile just to nudge me into using your app. Same principle, and honestly a lilegit use case for cookies so that LinkedIn can remember my decision.
Re:The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root ...
by mhluongo on Saturday August 13, 2022 @07:52AM
(#32449036)
Just because you don't like something doesn't mean it should be illegal? Pretty obvious.
Re:The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root ...
by hef19898 on Saturday August 13, 2022 @07:57AM
(#32449068)
I gave you a reason why I think this pattern should be illegal under, e.g., the EU privacy laws. So what's your reason for believing it should be legal to force people to use an app tgat collects all kinda of tracking data about users over an equally fine browser solution?
Re:The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root ...
by scarface74 on Saturday August 13, 2022 @09:11AM
(#32449557)
Nah, that just means we will have a pop up every time we launch an app just like we do now with every web page.
The last thing the world needs is yet another 99 section 10 chapter law by clueless lawmakers.
Re:The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root ...
by spurgu on Saturday August 13, 2022 @08:12AM
(#32449165)
For the longest time the web client was super glitchy (stuttering) on MacOS. Haven't used Zoom for maybe 2 years now though so things might've changed.
Re:The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root ...
by WhyNotHugo on Saturday August 13, 2022 @05:23AM
(#32448197)
Except for organisations which enforce e2ee. For end-to-end-encryption, only their desktop app works.
Re:The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root ...
by happymellon on Saturday August 13, 2022 @05:58AM
(#32448356)
Does the browser not support encryption?