News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CEO Shadow Program by skissane on Friday August 12, 2022 @09:12PM (#32445925)
Have you ever thought about a rule, that you can only downvote a comment if it has at least one reply (by anybody, not necessarily the downvoter)? That would discourage the demoralising situation where someone gets downvoted but is left guessing why.

Of course, there will be some comments which do not merit a reply (non-substantive contributions or blatant trolling) - but, those comments should be flagged anyway. Maybe count flags as downvotes (if they aren’t already), so you could still downvote reply-less comments by flagging them.

Re:CEO Shadow Program by pvg on Friday August 12, 2022 @09:35PM (#32446073)
That would discourage the demoralising situation where someone gets downvoted but is left guessing why.

It encourages replying to bad comments which is already a bigger problem than the sting of an unexpounded-upon downvote. 'No receipts required for downvotes' makes HN better.

Re:CEO Shadow Program by jzig on Friday August 12, 2022 @09:41PM (#32446107)
Strongly disagree. Maybe most people don’t receive feedback. But I believe there is at least a minority that does and can be influenced by feedback. Similar to US politics.

Edit: Notice how I upvoted you rather than downvoted out of disagreement

Re:CEO Shadow Program by tptacek on Saturday August 13, 2022 @01:30AM (#32447196)
He doesn't notice that, because votes at the margin are random, and 4 times out of 5 people complaining about voting can just wait and whatever's bothering them will be rectified organically.
Re:CEO Shadow Program by dang on Saturday August 13, 2022 @01:25PM (#32451909)
The downvoted commenter would still have no way to tell whether the downvote was related to the reply, since those would most often be coming from different users.
Re:CEO Shadow Program by jzig on Friday August 12, 2022 @09:18PM (#32445964)
That’s a great idea! Or something like it.