News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Overrun by influencers, historic sites are banning TikTok... by chrisseaton on Friday August 12, 2022 @02:41PM (#32442403)
They’ve got as much right to be there as you do!

> taking pictures with one in the background without consent

They don’t need your consent!

Re:Overrun by influencers, historic sites are banning TikTok... by alistairSH on Friday August 12, 2022 @03:34PM (#32442980)
They’ve got as much right to be there as you do!

Can do vs Should do.

Yes, you can stand in the middle of a narrow path and use a selfie stick to take photos. No, you shouldn't do that if it inconveniences everybody around you. Doing so anyways makes you a self-centered dickhead.

Re:Overrun by influencers, historic sites are banning TikTok... by MichaelCollins on Friday August 12, 2022 @02:44PM (#32442434)
How to make people like you: "The law doesn't forbid me from doing this to you!"

Right up there with "I'm not touching you!"

Re:Overrun by influencers, historic sites are banning TikTok... by chrisseaton on Friday August 12, 2022 @03:18PM (#32442825)
You’re not ‘doing’ anything to someone by taking a photo in public with them in the background. You don’t have reasonable expectations and it’s fine for reasonable people to disregard them.
Re:Overrun by influencers, historic sites are banning TikTok... by ghaff on Friday August 12, 2022 @03:15PM (#32442800)
It's one thing to shove a camera in someone's face. It's another for people to have any reasonable expectation of not getting into even the background of a photo when walking down a city street or in some other busy place.
Re:Overrun by influencers, historic sites are banning TikTok... by thaumasiotes on Friday August 12, 2022 @03:08PM (#32442730)
Well, yes. I'm not touching you right now.

And if you're offended by that, you are being egregiously unreasonable. Exactly the same is true of the picture-taking "concern".