This is a quote from the post I replied to, which is why I said it, as a mirror to the arrogance of the material I responded to. The post I responded to posits that those in favour of governments and collective action are not emotionally grown.
If it is not kind, then neither is the original.
> posits that those in favour of governments and collective action are not emotionally grown
I didn't read it like that - I read it as the ability to self-govern requires great individual responsibility and emotional control. Whether this is the only way forward is up for debate, but I agree it requires an (unlikely?) level of public competence.
This is arrogant, and condescending, not kind.